Search for: "Barrett v. Hobbs"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2019, 11:34 am
Unfortunately, the Second Circuit held that substantive Hobbs Act robbery qualifies under the force clause, in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:37 pm
See Barrett v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 9:24 am
Barrett, 927 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2019). [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:16 pm
Barrett, 937 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2019)); and (attempted Hobbs Act robbery. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:14 pm
Barrett, No. 14-2641 (2d Cir. 2018), which held that § 924(c)(3)’s residual clause is not unconstitutionally vague and that conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of violence. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:29 am
The Supreme Court recently granted a certiorari petition in Davis v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 2:55 pm
The US Supreme Court Tuesday heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 10:54 am
[With Justice Barrett joining Justice Kagan, does Dunn v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:01 am
University Federal Credit Union and GEICO Barrett v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Barrett's Jackson List. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Barrett, St. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm
One long stretch of questioning involved four justices — Breyer, Kagan, Samuel Alito, and Amy Coney Barrett — pressing Taibleson on a question that Alito put most succinctly: “Is it a violation of the Hobbs Act if a person attempts to threaten but does not actually threaten? [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm
(Justice Amy Coney Barrett is recused from this case.) [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
In Holt v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” Additional commentary on NIFLA comes from Jay Hobbs at CNS News. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
Hobbs, which involved a Muslim prisoner's wearing a beard). [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
I recall being enraptured by Griswold v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
Harris v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Because of her prior participation in the Wolf case, Barrett is expected to recuse herself from consideration of it. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm
Bruen, Dobbs v. [read post]
